<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Green Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everythingsgonegreen.co.uk/2007/the-green-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everythingsgonegreen.co.uk/2007/the-green-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone Green</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingsgonegreen.co.uk/2007/the-green-debate/#comment-20190</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingsgonegreen.co.uk/2007/the-green-debate/#comment-20190</guid>
		<description>GiorgosK, that&#039;s a fair path you&#039;ve taken. I have to admit that, whilst being extremely busy here, debating the points raised in the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.v7n.com/forums/politics/72535-global-warming-hoax.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;global warming is a hoax&lt;/a&gt;&quot; thread has been time-consuming yet highly interesting.

I think a lot of the scepticism shown regarding global warming and specifically man-made global warming, whilst certainly worthy of consideration, is unfortunately backed-up by some fairly close-minded thought processes. 

Whilst the members of the green side of the debate accept possibilities and options, the detractors seem to be entrenched in a more stubborn and diametrically opposed position, That&#039;s quite sad really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GiorgosK, that&#8217;s a fair path you&#8217;ve taken. I have to admit that, whilst being extremely busy here, debating the points raised in the &#8220;<a href="http://www.v7n.com/forums/politics/72535-global-warming-hoax.html" rel="nofollow">global warming is a hoax</a>&#8221; thread has been time-consuming yet highly interesting.</p>
<p>I think a lot of the scepticism shown regarding global warming and specifically man-made global warming, whilst certainly worthy of consideration, is unfortunately backed-up by some fairly close-minded thought processes. </p>
<p>Whilst the members of the green side of the debate accept possibilities and options, the detractors seem to be entrenched in a more stubborn and diametrically opposed position, That&#8217;s quite sad really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GiorgosK</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingsgonegreen.co.uk/2007/the-green-debate/#comment-20182</link>
		<dc:creator>GiorgosK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingsgonegreen.co.uk/2007/the-green-debate/#comment-20182</guid>
		<description>I have seen the debate and I have followed it from day one but I chose not to participate because of the title of the post

It was pretty clear they did not want to debate it and were not open to discussions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen the debate and I have followed it from day one but I chose not to participate because of the title of the post</p>
<p>It was pretty clear they did not want to debate it and were not open to discussions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

